146
attributed utterances — redacted entirely
33
mentions inside other people’s material — minimised to “[name removed]”
1/ 6
claims that would lose all support — 5 keep independent support
Claims that disappear (1)
- Robert Kahn set the investment frame in March 2024: return on investment inside twelve months of signature, with the case built on fresh waste because that is what the board asks him about following a newspaper story.
Claims that survive re-cited (5)
- The 3.4% waste figure that Lena Fischer and Robert Kahn took to the board in April 2026 is derived off those extract totals — the same totals later found not to reconcile with till data. · 1 surviving receipt
- Whether the warehouse goods-receipt data can ever be obtained is unresolved. The archive records who owns the system (Nils Ackermann, logistics IT), that Priya asked twice (2024 and 2025), that Kahn escalated in June 2026 (“Send me when the…”), and that no answer exists in the corpus. · 1 surviving receipt
- On 20 May 2025 Marco Rossi told Robert Kahn the 90-day headline numbers were drawn from “the pilot cohort of 40 stores” — wrong when written: the cohort had been 25 since September 2024. Kahn had seen both numbers that month; Marco corrected it the next day (“My note below was wrong”). · 2 surviving receipts
- At the 90-day review (22 May 2025) the reported headline results were: forecast accuracy up 6.2 points versus baseline, ambient inventory down 9%, order automation at 91% — all ambient, pilot-cohort numbers. Robert Kahn’s response was to ask where the fresh waste reduction was: “that is the case I approved”. · 1 surviving receipt
- On the signature-clock reading the twelve-month expectation was not met: signature was July 2024, fresh went live in December 2025, and in June 2026 Marco Rossi answered Robert Kahn’s question with “On that reading, no.” An alternative reading (clock from fresh go-live, ending December 2026) exists in the conversation, but Marco declined to argue for it. · 3 surviving receipts
Disclosed boundaries
- Original source files outside this application are untouched; this erasure covers everything the agent derived and stores: segments, citations, claims, the commitment trail, document summaries, cached answers, signals and both full-text indexes.
- The person is kept as a tombstone in the deletion register so the erasure itself remains auditable; their name survives nowhere else in the working memory.
- Name variants recorded for this person are erased with them.
Effect on practice question P1 (live preview)
The current P1 answer, before erasure. After erasure the same composition runs again — figures only this person reported will vanish from it.
Erase Robert Kahn
Transactional and irreversible within this application: working corpus, citation store, claim memory, commitment trails, document summaries, cached answers, signals and both full-text indexes are rebuilt in one transaction. Type the full name to confirm.